Today, for the
nth time since September, the National Conciliation and Mediation Board
(NCMB) of the Department of Labor and
Employment (DOLE) is calling a mediation session between the union of Citra
Mina workers and the Citra Mina Group of Companies’ (CMGC) management. The issue of dispute : the arbitrary, summary
dismissal of 180 workers and employees of Citra Mina Group of Companies last September 16, 2013, in the wake of the workers’
formation of their union. Majority of those dismissed are union members and
officers. The mass dismissal forced the
workers to go on strike on November .
To effect the
mass termination of employment, the CMGC employed the old, long-exposed trick of
so-called “independently-operating” sister companies, where one is made to
appear losing while the other is making money.
CMGC claims, after the union was organized and duly
registered with the Bureau of Labor Relations, that they have five independently-operating
sister companies – the Citra Mina Seafoods Corporation (CMSC), the Mommy Gina
Tuna Resources (MGTR), Philfresh, Tuna Exporters, Inc and the Citra Mina Seafoods
Market, Inc. (CMSI), the retailing arm. And that they have decided to cease the
operations of CMSC because it was losing due to “reduced market demand for
fresh frozen fish”.
The fact is that
all the first four so-called independent companies are operating as one under
the CGMC. CMGC’s operation is divided
into divisions, not companies – the CMGC Human Resource Department, the CMGC
Administrative Department, the CMGC Accounting Department, the CMGC Plant
Production Department, etc. This
singular operation is centered in a single compound in Tambler, General Santos City
with a signage as Citra Mina Group of Companies, in just one building within
the compound with no distinct production areas. The production hall is divided
not along “distinct companies” but rather, along product line with no
distinction in employers. Regular lead
persons listed as CMSC workers are likewise listed as MGTR lead persons.
Meanwhile the bulk of the workforce is provided on contractual basis by another
Lu-operated labor only-contracting company, the Manpower
There is a
common employee ID card issued by the CMGC CHRD in 2010, common CGMC-issued forms
from each department to be filled-up by all employees without so-called
employer distinction; common office policies and employee manual. Production
groupings are formed without distinction as to distinct “employers”. The single
CMGC CHRD can transfer production workers from one product line to another; can
hire, suspend and dismiss any of the employees; can transfer workers from
so-alled “CMSC” list to “MGTR” lists. Each CMGC fishing vessel is manned
collectively by a crew without “employer” distinction – the boat captain maybe
listed as MGTR employee, the boat engineer, a CMSC employee.
The claim of
“reduced market demand for fresh frozen fish products” does not hold water.
Just a day after the arbitrary termination of employment of the union officers
and members, the CMGC, through “Mommy Gina Tuna Resources” posted an
announcement for urgent hiring for the same positions vacated.
The claim of “
CMSC losses” will likewise not hold.
CMGC was hiring new probationaries in 2013 prior to the arbitrary
dismissal of workers, in fact listing 49 of these probationaries as new CMSC
employees and workers.
The termination
of 180 employees and workers is plain
and simple union busting. There was
no “cessation of fresh frozen fish operation” as claimed. The urgent hiring for the same positions
vacated attests to this. It clearly demonstrates that the Citra Mina management simply cannot, and will not, allow the workers
to exercise their right to free association, i.e. to organize a union. The
workers cannot be allowed to have a collective voice on matters of common
concern.
A considerable
number of those dismissed have been with the company for more than a decade,
some for more than a score. Yet they
still receive only the daily minimum wage of P270 while being made to assume bigger
responsibilities. A boat captain, a boat
engineer, a boat oiler receive the same wage as a vessel crew. Worse they are made to poach in Indonesian
waters, and face the risk of incarceration, as indeed a whole vessel crew were
caught by Indonesian authorities in 1995 and imprisoned for two years.
Suspensions are
imposed arbitrarily even for minor infractions. Worse, even for the most
unreasonable pretexts. Last year, when a
boat oiler refused to fish in Indonesian waters without the proper legal
documents, he was arbitrarily suspended. A worker who got dizzy due to
inhalation of hazardous gas while at work, sent home by his supervisor, and
suffered the lingering effect of such inhalation for days was arbitrarily
suspended when he reported back for work.
And minor
infractions are used to cut short the employees work record. Thus an old boat captain who has been with
the company since 1992 is recorded as hired only in 2005. In fact, the company’s
employees record show the earliest hired employee as being with the company
only since 2002.
In 2010, the
workers were made to work for extended hours (2-4 hours more) for months
without extra pay, purportedly to help the company take off. Yet when the
company did take off, the workers’ condition never improved.
It took years
before the workers succeeded to form a union that can serve as their collective
voice. Yet that success in exercising
that right became their own curse. They
lost their jobs; their families are now starved, penalized for the workers’
effort at building a capability to seek more humane terms and conditions of
work.
The right to
free association is an inherent workers’ right, a right borne out of their
being members of the human specie, the most social of living species. And this
right, and the accompanying rights to bargain collectively and to concerted
action when justified have been enshrined for nearly a century in international
statutes and for decades in local statutes.
Yet the family of Joaquin Lu, out of greed for profit, can shamelessly,
arrogantly trample on these rights.
The condition in
Citra Mina mirrors the condition of workers elsewhere in the country. Workers
get short-changed; perpetually kept on contractual employment; paid with
starvation wages; denied their rights. No wonder poverty is high even among
employed wage-and-salaried workers. And why despite the gargantuan increase in
the labor force, the number of unionized workers nearly halved in the past ten
years.
This injustice
to workers cannot be let to pass. We stand with the workers of Citra Mina in their
struggle to assert their rights : to a fair share of the fruits of their
labour; to associate and address common concerns in concert; for humane
conditions of work and life. And we call on all those who value justice and
democracy to join us in this struggle.
We call on other similarly situated workers : Dare to
assert your rights. Break free from the chain of submission that have kept you
passive while your rights are violated.
You will not be alone.
We call on the DOLE: Perform your
constitutional duty to uphold the workers’ rights. Let your action on this issue speak on the
PNoy government’s attitude and policy on human rights.
Kilusan sa Pambansang Demokrasya
18
February 2014
1 comment:
bigyan sana ng hustisya ang 180 worker na sapilitang tinanggal nang citra mina companies...ayaw nang taga citra mina management ang union dahil ayaw nilang bigyan ng magandanga benepisyo ang mga trabahante at sinasamantala lamang nila ang employment crisis ng bansa. Ang perang pumapasok sa companya lamang ang iniisip ng may-ari, hindi nila binibigyan ng importansya ang karapatan ng mga empleyado..Ang Human resources ng nasabing companya ay dapat hati ang kanyang pananaw, inihantulad ko sa isang linta ang leader ng human resources sa nasabing companya,,,wala kang konsensya ang tanging alam mo lang ay sumipsip ng sumipsip...at sa may ari ng kompanya alam kung may kabutihan ka, balikan mo ang iyong kahapon.
Post a Comment